PERMANENT AWARD EVIDENCE

SC24029 Highway Term Maintenance Contract 2026

KENT COUNTY COUNCIL · published 16 Dec 2025. This page preserves the identifiers and current held fields for one Contracts Finder release; it is not an invoice, performance assessment or complete contract history.

Contracts Finder release ID8cd6b80b-3b98-45be-9eba-bd3c1531b4a6-875920
Open Contracting ID (OCID)ocds-b5fd17-cacdca39-aa8a-434c-9a81-1fd5cfa12d4c
Buyer identifierGB-SRS-sid4gov.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/XjVA96JU
Release typeaward
PUBLISHED COMMERCIAL FIELDS

Values stay separate.

A tender estimate and an award value answer different questions. Neither is treated as cash paid.

Award value
£2,000,000,000
award field
Tender value
£2,000,000,000
tender field
Procurement method
Competitive procedure with negotiation (above threshold)
Category
services
CPV
50230000
Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment
Delivery
England, United Kingdom
No postcode
PUBLISHED DESCRIPTION

What the notice says

The Procurement was undertaken as a competitive procedure with negotiation under Regulation 29 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. Following, three separate rounds of market engagement in January, June, and August 2024 the Procurement launched on 21 October 2024. The Council encouraged small and medium-sized enterprises to participate in the Procurement, either as Candidates, consortium members, supply-chain partners or sub-contractors. The Selection Questionnaire (the "SQ") Stage of the Procurement closed on 25 November 2024. An Invitation to Submit Initial Tender (the "ISIT") was released in December 2024 to the Candidates shortlisted at the SQ Stage (subsequently referred to as "Tenderers"). Only quality was evaluated during the Initial Tender Stage, and following this stage, the top three (3) ranked Tenderers were issued with an Invitation to Submit Detailed Tender (the "ISDT") and invited to the Detailed Tender Stage. At the Detailed Tender Stage, quality was evaluated and a detailed review of the Schedules of Rates was undertaken for the purposes of providing feedback to the Tenderers. The Council did not apply the Price Per Quality Point evaluation method at Detailed Tender Stage. All three (3) Tenderers were issued with an Invitation to Submit Final Tender (the "ISFT"). At the Final Tender Stage of the Procurement the Council evaluated the Tenderers' quality responses and used the Schedules of Rates to calculate the Tenderers' Price per Quality Point. The most economically advantageous Tenderer was determined by the Tenderer receiving the lowest Price per Quality Point.

Tender statuscomplete
STAGE-DATE LEDGER

Reported dates, without an invented lifecycle.

The current projection contains one award release, not a verified chain of planning, tender, award, contract and modification records. Dates are shown in source-field order and are not silently repaired.

  1. 01Notice publishedPublication timestamp on the held release16 Dec 2025
  2. 02Tender period endsTender-period field as published25 Nov 2024
  3. 03Contract startsContract-period field as published30 Apr 2026
  4. 04Contract endsContract-period field as published30 Apr 2040
SUPPLIER EVIDENCE

Published names and exact identifiers

A company profile appears only when this release carries a usable company number. Name-only suppliers remain name-only.

SOURCE

Contracts Finder release

Published 16 Dec 2025 · held through the daily award projection · Open Government Licence v3.0.

Inspect the official JSON release ↗